Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-08 03:59:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3A0CC2DDC6120C5600DB6C1433CCF229F5B0C350C283288BD4F56CA48B1C2083
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note does not cite the meta-analysis: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8099405/ The authors of the meta-analysis have a conflict of interest because they benefit materially from their results as plastic surgeons. The results only set a lower bound on regret because the data is short-term: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02623-5

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720110369266401288
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3A0CC2DDC6120C5600DB6C1433CCF229F5B0C350C283288BD4F56CA48B1C2083
  • createdAtMillis - 1699415948452
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17201103692664012883A0CC2DDC6120C5600DB6C1433CCF229F5B0C350C283288BD4F56CA48B1C2083