Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 11:51:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E6D382E8D0D2BF089C0C6C068FF0E4A605225E33975675ACE25A4353C71AA6D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

本ポストはエビデンスを重視しない朝日新聞に対して批判的な投稿であり、「エビデンスが求められるのは一般的である」旨のノートは必要ありません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720036932045218035
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E6D382E8D0D2BF089C0C6C068FF0E4A605225E33975675ACE25A4353C71AA6D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1698925907243
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720036932045218035E6D382E8D0D2BF089C0C6C068FF0E4A605225E33975675ACE25A4353C71AA6D1