Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 00:38:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CDC7ADC397ACB937064241900379CCFE8EE5FF22D1C661B839043F44C8D56944
Participant Details

Original Note:

本ポストはエビデンスを重視しない朝日新聞に対して批判的な投稿であり、「エビデンスが求められるのは一般的である」旨のノートは必要ありません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720036932045218035
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CDC7ADC397ACB937064241900379CCFE8EE5FF22D1C661B839043F44C8D56944
  • createdAtMillis - 1698971900894
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720036932045218035CDC7ADC397ACB937064241900379CCFE8EE5FF22D1C661B839043F44C8D56944