Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 13:42:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B92A21CBCA70321CB87843370912AE9498B7C9D8E28258BCF75196229FF421B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

本ポストはエビデンスを重視しない朝日新聞に対して批判的な投稿であり、「エビデンスが求められるのは一般的である」旨のノートは必要ありません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720036932045218035
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B92A21CBCA70321CB87843370912AE9498B7C9D8E28258BCF75196229FF421B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1698932553550
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720036932045218035B92A21CBCA70321CB87843370912AE9498B7C9D8E28258BCF75196229FF421B1