Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 22:06:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B1B7C8C924ED01A1308FD5E4347C4B22026071F95F2421281F9883BE94A76252
Participant Details

Original Note:

本ポストはエビデンスを重視しない朝日新聞に対して批判的な投稿であり、「エビデンスが求められるのは一般的である」旨のノートは必要ありません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720036932045218035
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B1B7C8C924ED01A1308FD5E4347C4B22026071F95F2421281F9883BE94A76252
  • createdAtMillis - 1699049192639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720036932045218035B1B7C8C924ED01A1308FD5E4347C4B22026071F95F2421281F9883BE94A76252