Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 16:13:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D3FD56DEEA5AFA6B4EC8C004EAAF68237A43BEE8714B9B8E5AF59079AE2963B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note needs changing or NNN The original charter from the 80s is not a good rebuttal. This is due to their being an updated charter from 2017. Please make a note: using their current charter or justify why it is not usable and the old charter is https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/hamas-2017-document-full

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720033805803610139
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D3FD56DEEA5AFA6B4EC8C004EAAF68237A43BEE8714B9B8E5AF59079AE2963B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1698941599232
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720033805803610139D3FD56DEEA5AFA6B4EC8C004EAAF68237A43BEE8714B9B8E5AF59079AE2963B9