Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 23:24:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 82DD5667DDA4BF7D0A0F347CE5F26B4AECDFBB678E2E39E904128A88B6260CA5
Participant Details

Original Note:

L’interprétation de cette décision est inexacte. En effet, il suffit d’une simple lecture de l’arrêt en question pour constater que, les faits d’agression sexuelle, prétendument commis par le candidat à l’âge de 14 ans, ont été classés sans suite¹. ¹ : https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/CETATEXT000032771577 (voir paragraphe nº5)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720030992751034825
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 82DD5667DDA4BF7D0A0F347CE5F26B4AECDFBB678E2E39E904128A88B6260CA5
  • createdAtMillis - 1698967484716
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172003099275103482582DD5667DDA4BF7D0A0F347CE5F26B4AECDFBB678E2E39E904128A88B6260CA5