Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 14:14:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D80E7EAEDC55CE7700D59810ED7C93F4A102151F17FEB76DF4051B950090F0B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, there is no reason to doubt this review over the Cochrane one. Disagreement with the poster's ethics or integrity should be a comment, not a Note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720028245981380610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D80E7EAEDC55CE7700D59810ED7C93F4A102151F17FEB76DF4051B950090F0B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1699020864005
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720028245981380610D80E7EAEDC55CE7700D59810ED7C93F4A102151F17FEB76DF4051B950090F0B4