Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-11-02 17:01:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B633F1D871762D43D3F09BF6DCBBA1B2BE483A6B2D1DA9BC14BF92E7851C0B4F
Participant Details
Original Note:
The ruling made by the judge did not find that fraud had occurred. He found that the "evidence of malfeasance" warranted a new vote due to the "...volume of ballots so mishandled..." that he ordered a new primary election be held. https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=26199518 https://apnews.com/article/connecticut-judge-bridgeport-ganim-mayor-election-1e6d23567703c55430968ffdaa0b6369
All Note Details