Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 10:42:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6163504B8058E6B41A93B247AB2CEAB822368459A090233D7ACC37E42E64D702
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge did not rule election fraud was found or convict anyone of election fraud. The court ruled the potential mishandling of ballots leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result of the primary; and a new election will be held. https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=26199518

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719933355876036980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6163504B8058E6B41A93B247AB2CEAB822368459A090233D7ACC37E42E64D702
  • createdAtMillis - 1698921746913
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17199333558760369806163504B8058E6B41A93B247AB2CEAB822368459A090233D7ACC37E42E64D702