Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 08:37:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 444BBE26CD4FD078A25406C211137DF08522945FB80C701AB89A83B7B8B4A93B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge did not rule election fraud was found or convict anyone of election fraud. The court ruled the potential mishandling of ballots leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result of the primary; and a new election will be held. https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=26199518

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719933355876036980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 444BBE26CD4FD078A25406C211137DF08522945FB80C701AB89A83B7B8B4A93B
  • createdAtMillis - 1698914271730
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1719933355876036980444BBE26CD4FD078A25406C211137DF08522945FB80C701AB89A83B7B8B4A93B