Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 10:31:29 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13A6D5C883FBA049C4243046560B06A5CD5D6074964735602E8D92F16D733CBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge did not rule election fraud was found or convict anyone of election fraud. The court ruled the potential mishandling of ballots leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result of the primary; and a new election will be held. https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=26199518

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719933355876036980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13A6D5C883FBA049C4243046560B06A5CD5D6074964735602E8D92F16D733CBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1698921089450
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171993335587603698013A6D5C883FBA049C4243046560B06A5CD5D6074964735602E8D92F16D733CBE