Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 05:38:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D43D36F7978600441BBA0FB5304BEA52AFB5848EDE7A256891F57D4EABF97C45
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence the author was pressured. "Following publication, the first author contacted the editorial office regarding an improper experimental design with the potential to significantly affect the integrity of the resultant experimental data." https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/5/1011

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719881325065445677
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D43D36F7978600441BBA0FB5304BEA52AFB5848EDE7A256891F57D4EABF97C45
  • createdAtMillis - 1698903503391
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1719881325065445677D43D36F7978600441BBA0FB5304BEA52AFB5848EDE7A256891F57D4EABF97C45