Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 07:52:55 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B3A25A160F5CD87C436C627B1490B6679ADBF937CCDA1C7D906A7BE24E4D935
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence the author was pressured. "Following publication, the first author contacted the editorial office regarding an improper experimental design with the potential to significantly affect the integrity of the resultant experimental data." https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/5/1011

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719881325065445677
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B3A25A160F5CD87C436C627B1490B6679ADBF937CCDA1C7D906A7BE24E4D935
  • createdAtMillis - 1698911575098
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17198813250654456770B3A25A160F5CD87C436C627B1490B6679ADBF937CCDA1C7D906A7BE24E4D935