Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-01 15:17:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DB65A4AAB36414A1C171705E573680E18533AB0078FB1A1C8DFAD9072E9DA45D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Recording indiviudals in public is constitutionally protected by the First Amendment. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/07/03/22-35271.pdf At least where there is some public interest - such as for political activity on issues of public concern - prohibitions on publishing people's identity (doxxing) are unconstitutional. https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/arizona/azdce/2:2022cv01431/1307734/43

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719711235141198043
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DB65A4AAB36414A1C171705E573680E18533AB0078FB1A1C8DFAD9072E9DA45D
  • createdAtMillis - 1698851856078
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1719711235141198043DB65A4AAB36414A1C171705E573680E18533AB0078FB1A1C8DFAD9072E9DA45D