Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 13:50:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4886AB9236E9119A06102B01F770C26B02C120934CC8FC3B8C2DFA076719626B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Recording indiviudals in public is constitutionally protected by the First Amendment. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/07/03/22-35271.pdf At least where there is some public interest - such as for political activity on issues of public concern - prohibitions on publishing people's identity (doxxing) are unconstitutional. https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/arizona/azdce/2:2022cv01431/1307734/43

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719711235141198043
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4886AB9236E9119A06102B01F770C26B02C120934CC8FC3B8C2DFA076719626B
  • createdAtMillis - 1698933050564
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17197112351411980434886AB9236E9119A06102B01F770C26B02C120934CC8FC3B8C2DFA076719626B