Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-01 11:40:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F4AD43E65C87AA10A47FA89941F4ED1FA1EA08831E72E314426A167436ED598
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sostenere che gli screening mammografici siano superflui รจ falso e non trova riscontro in letteratura scientifica. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-01174-9

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719656285736432072
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F4AD43E65C87AA10A47FA89941F4ED1FA1EA08831E72E314426A167436ED598
  • createdAtMillis - 1698838808189
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17196562857364320722F4AD43E65C87AA10A47FA89941F4ED1FA1EA08831E72E314426A167436ED598