Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-01 13:33:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7817FE598AFFC9406A3A177D72AEFB92668F843438F28161AAE90856EB6B7089
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN la afirmación es una opinión que se concluye a partir del post citado. Notas sobre dicho post deben hacerse sobre el mismo. Con relación a la nota propuesta, en Australia se ha puesto en duda el alcance de la protección del derecho de libertad de expresión https://www.theguardian.com/law/2021/jun/16/freedom-of-speech-may-not-be-protected-by-australias-constitution-high-court-judge-says

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719566069428301840
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7817FE598AFFC9406A3A177D72AEFB92668F843438F28161AAE90856EB6B7089
  • createdAtMillis - 1698845617984
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17195660694283018407817FE598AFFC9406A3A177D72AEFB92668F843438F28161AAE90856EB6B7089