Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-31 20:13:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A79BC3D35BEAF670C155FB3A1EE5221286BE2AD49B92E499D0C2916829432979
Participant Details

Original Note:

An objective survey would need to randomly select participants, not have participants self select from an existing audience. The results follow a normal distribution, which is what you might expect if you asked people to define "recent". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4115258/ https://www.qualtrics.com/au/experience-management/research/selection-bias/ https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230280816_29

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719435914865443205
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A79BC3D35BEAF670C155FB3A1EE5221286BE2AD49B92E499D0C2916829432979
  • createdAtMillis - 1698783239070
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1719435914865443205A79BC3D35BEAF670C155FB3A1EE5221286BE2AD49B92E499D0C2916829432979