Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-31 20:33:15 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A02B47A809897348535735CFF246637FF77274C156031E5EFD94340794B474E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

An objective survey would need to randomly select participants, not have participants self select from an existing audience. The results follow a normal distribution, which is what you might expect if you asked people to define "recent". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4115258/ https://www.qualtrics.com/au/experience-management/research/selection-bias/ https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230280816_29

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719435914865443205
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A02B47A809897348535735CFF246637FF77274C156031E5EFD94340794B474E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1698784395760
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1719435914865443205A02B47A809897348535735CFF246637FF77274C156031E5EFD94340794B474E5