Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-31 12:14:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 577D2ECBD436E3870FC724381427351D63414E61DA83F3E934C0C2CA2BD0CE01
Participant Details

Original Note:

毒性試験結果等の科学的根拠に基づいてADI(許容一日摂取量)やARfD(急性参照用量)を決定し、それぞれ超えないように基準値を決めるルールは何ら変更されていません。 個々の農産物の基準値は想定する消費量等によって変わるものであり、一部の農産物の基準値だけを見て「緩和」と考えるのは正しくありません。 一部の農産物の基準値が増減しても、ADIやARfDが変更されず、かつ、摂取量をこの80%以内に留める限り、食の安全性は担保されます。 https://www.fsc.go.jp/emerg/adi.pdf https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/shokuhin/zanryu/faq.html https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-11130500-Shokuhinanzenbu/0000059523.pdf https://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/consumer_safety/food_safety/risk_commu_2019_003/pdf/consumer_safety_cms203_20200327_01.pdf https://agrifact.jp/pesticide-residue-limits-have-not-been-loosened-what-truth-about-glyphosate7/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719318547455963341
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 577D2ECBD436E3870FC724381427351D63414E61DA83F3E934C0C2CA2BD0CE01
  • createdAtMillis - 1698754487502
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1719318547455963341577D2ECBD436E3870FC724381427351D63414E61DA83F3E934C0C2CA2BD0CE01