Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-30 22:26:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69F10E5FBA8CCC9CF8761999DBC9D09609F312DD25131B4F3726CEF4D6C02182
Participant Details

Original Note:

Konsensus vychází z vědeckých faktů, nikoli z názorů několika set jednotlivců. https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ 1600 nesouhlasících vědců neznamená, že "neexistuje vědecký konsenzus (shoda)" ohledně vlivu člověka na globální klimatické změny. Zde je seznam mnoha organizací, které se na daném shodly: https://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1719115487529869578
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 69F10E5FBA8CCC9CF8761999DBC9D09609F312DD25131B4F3726CEF4D6C02182
createdAtMillis - 1698704799549
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 171911548752986957869F10E5FBA8CCC9CF8761999DBC9D09609F312DD25131B4F3726CEF4D6C02182