Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-30 23:03:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 14034CDEA1EB4C5EEA56C2AEA703FC3EF31AAC071DFDAE706CCA70742B394577
Participant Details

Original Note:

Konsensus vychází z vědeckých faktů, nikoli z názorů několika set jednotlivců. https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ 1600 nesouhlasících vědců neznamená, že "neexistuje vědecký konsenzus (shoda)" ohledně vlivu člověka na globální klimatické změny. Zde je seznam mnoha organizací, které se na daném shodly: https://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719115487529869578
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 14034CDEA1EB4C5EEA56C2AEA703FC3EF31AAC071DFDAE706CCA70742B394577
  • createdAtMillis - 1698706990965
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171911548752986957814034CDEA1EB4C5EEA56C2AEA703FC3EF31AAC071DFDAE706CCA70742B394577