Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-31 02:33:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FF9D56B112CFDB80DE398EDAB4CB17717D2DA8B20CD682BC24A65C11C1A1E35
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - O post não nega a taxa de falha de metodos contraceptivo, mas crítica quem afirma a sua ineficiência puramente por experiência pessoal quando muitas vezes o método não era utilizado da forma correta. É comum posts na internet que servem puramente para assustar as pessoas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719071189048373543
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FF9D56B112CFDB80DE398EDAB4CB17717D2DA8B20CD682BC24A65C11C1A1E35
  • createdAtMillis - 1698719632170
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17190711890483735430FF9D56B112CFDB80DE398EDAB4CB17717D2DA8B20CD682BC24A65C11C1A1E35