Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-30 17:45:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6BB29F3A2D52AAC61AAB7C7E037C26EE4E04582F205D78AC6060F00D1E69543E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: She uses a pejorative name for the act that opponents of it use but her claim is factually correct about what it authorizes. Insisting that the act get its full name is unnecessarily pedandic. https://www.hrw.org/news/2002/08/03/us-hague-invasion-act-becomes-law

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718986914705908087
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6BB29F3A2D52AAC61AAB7C7E037C26EE4E04582F205D78AC6060F00D1E69543E
  • createdAtMillis - 1698687911239
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17189869147059080876BB29F3A2D52AAC61AAB7C7E037C26EE4E04582F205D78AC6060F00D1E69543E