Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-29 17:34:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9407D90FFA5666BA5BFDA3578EB8F4929DB8BD7F9C1FEEEC53193FCAF22E29C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cochrane ist grundsätzlich eine gute Quelle. Das Problem des oft genannten Reviews ist jedoch, dass die RCTs alle einen großen Risk of Bias haben und die Adhärenz gering war. Das Review selbst bestätigt dies. Der Aufruf des RKI braucht daher keinen Warnhinweis. https://www.factcheck.org/2023/03/scicheck-what-the-cochrane-review-says-about-masks-for-covid-19-and-what-it-doesnt/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718619883565412846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9407D90FFA5666BA5BFDA3578EB8F4929DB8BD7F9C1FEEEC53193FCAF22E29C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1698600898598
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17186198835654128469407D90FFA5666BA5BFDA3578EB8F4929DB8BD7F9C1FEEEC53193FCAF22E29C4