Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-29 15:27:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7505AC1D1231BB194AEA120FB53E0ABB15428A6D603A1C7648174021C5C9840F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cochrane ist grundsätzlich eine gute Quelle. Das Problem des oft genannten Reviews ist jedoch, dass die RCTs alle einen großen Risk of Bias haben und die Adhärenz gering war. Das Review selbst bestätigt dies. Der Aufruf des RKI braucht daher keinen Warnhinweis. https://www.factcheck.org/2023/03/scicheck-what-the-cochrane-review-says-about-masks-for-covid-19-and-what-it-doesnt/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718619883565412846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7505AC1D1231BB194AEA120FB53E0ABB15428A6D603A1C7648174021C5C9840F
  • createdAtMillis - 1698593226610
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17186198835654128467505AC1D1231BB194AEA120FB53E0ABB15428A6D603A1C7648174021C5C9840F