Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 12:42:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3DD746F1FCEE72429506BC176973477B8A6FC9B5D0E27EB5C10D852008E74232
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cochrane ist grundsätzlich eine gute Quelle. Das Problem des oft genannten Reviews ist jedoch, dass die RCTs alle einen großen Risk of Bias haben und die Adhärenz gering war. Das Review selbst bestätigt dies. Der Aufruf des RKI braucht daher keinen Warnhinweis. https://www.factcheck.org/2023/03/scicheck-what-the-cochrane-review-says-about-masks-for-covid-19-and-what-it-doesnt/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718619883565412846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3DD746F1FCEE72429506BC176973477B8A6FC9B5D0E27EB5C10D852008E74232
  • createdAtMillis - 1698928948144
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17186198835654128463DD746F1FCEE72429506BC176973477B8A6FC9B5D0E27EB5C10D852008E74232