Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-29 13:37:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 293D7CDBFE471302EE756611FD9010683ED7074AFC0EC7F1582FBE8A713B4A44
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cochrane ist grundsätzlich eine gute Quelle. Das Problem des oft genannten Reviews ist jedoch, dass die RCTs alle einen großen Risk of Bias haben und die Adhärenz gering war. Das Review selbst bestätigt dies. Der Aufruf des RKI braucht daher keinen Warnhinweis. https://www.factcheck.org/2023/03/scicheck-what-the-cochrane-review-says-about-masks-for-covid-19-and-what-it-doesnt/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718619883565412846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 293D7CDBFE471302EE756611FD9010683ED7074AFC0EC7F1582FBE8A713B4A44
  • createdAtMillis - 1698586647179
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1718619883565412846293D7CDBFE471302EE756611FD9010683ED7074AFC0EC7F1582FBE8A713B4A44