Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 00:43:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E4B956C95CFBD1C3B4A44241D20E6837A54042F2A13092AC4C2CA8DBB198529D
Participant Details

Original Note:

There's no evidence for any of the claims in this tweet, which is based on his previous equally false tweet. Previous: https://twitter.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1718262960206827616 Subsequent debunking by the outlet itself: https://twitter.com/haaretzcom/status/1718313215933698415

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718534357261201650
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E4B956C95CFBD1C3B4A44241D20E6837A54042F2A13092AC4C2CA8DBB198529D
  • createdAtMillis - 1705625006705
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1718534357261201650E4B956C95CFBD1C3B4A44241D20E6837A54042F2A13092AC4C2CA8DBB198529D