Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-06 07:49:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85F99FC99E0EA43C9FE59E3650E5EA1B5E3A3F915F6578316E0BAA94CB7F9E90
Participant Details

Original Note:

There's no evidence for any of the claims in this tweet, which is based on his previous equally false tweet. Previous: https://twitter.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1718262960206827616 Subsequent debunking by the outlet itself: https://twitter.com/haaretzcom/status/1718313215933698415

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718534357261201650
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85F99FC99E0EA43C9FE59E3650E5EA1B5E3A3F915F6578316E0BAA94CB7F9E90
  • createdAtMillis - 1699256959740
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171853435726120165085F99FC99E0EA43C9FE59E3650E5EA1B5E3A3F915F6578316E0BAA94CB7F9E90