Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-28 19:24:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB55F12B6D9A08AA5B76F6838ADD7567EA10F6355C64B16F2FB5AFA9FA1D572A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Autant la note proposée peut être jugée comme utile sur le tweet de l'AFP, autant elle ne démontre pas que le tweet de JLM est trompeur. Elle ne devrait donc pas être affichée sur ce tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718346859956052369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB55F12B6D9A08AA5B76F6838ADD7567EA10F6355C64B16F2FB5AFA9FA1D572A
  • createdAtMillis - 1698521049604
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1718346859956052369EB55F12B6D9A08AA5B76F6838ADD7567EA10F6355C64B16F2FB5AFA9FA1D572A