Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-28 19:22:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 86334D64FEC8F68FC85D7AA8B512A3B04C661F56C23C32649BCA3C5FCA4CBB2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Haaretz has denied all the claims in this tweet. https://x.com/haaretzcom/status/1718313215933698415?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718344951212167421
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 86334D64FEC8F68FC85D7AA8B512A3B04C661F56C23C32649BCA3C5FCA4CBB2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1698520971010
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171834495121216742186334D64FEC8F68FC85D7AA8B512A3B04C661F56C23C32649BCA3C5FCA4CBB2D