Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-28 23:41:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A9AFEFE629960EC4B1D40589D9D98D4F4DEE5C541D0815C8A057886129E4FFE2
Participant Details

Original Note:

These claims have no basis in Haaretz reporting. https://twitter.com/haaretzcom/status/1718312889986212189?t=AUdlVczmVcJ1q1Y8dqq1tA&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718315091873952140
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A9AFEFE629960EC4B1D40589D9D98D4F4DEE5C541D0815C8A057886129E4FFE2
  • createdAtMillis - 1698536482288
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1718315091873952140A9AFEFE629960EC4B1D40589D9D98D4F4DEE5C541D0815C8A057886129E4FFE2