Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-28 19:31:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2AFF5B5AB9727A2AB9E3CF8F4BF4E6B72ECCFFF911FB4E3005F592496D700D62
Participant Details

Original Note:

These claims have no basis in Haaretz reporting. https://twitter.com/haaretzcom/status/1718312889986212189?t=AUdlVczmVcJ1q1Y8dqq1tA&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718315091873952140
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2AFF5B5AB9727A2AB9E3CF8F4BF4E6B72ECCFFF911FB4E3005F592496D700D62
  • createdAtMillis - 1698521506641
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17183150918739521402AFF5B5AB9727A2AB9E3CF8F4BF4E6B72ECCFFF911FB4E3005F592496D700D62