Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-29 08:11:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D6E0C0CCD268E4A3991A95345A0F16C2FF3193DBF49C55E55911E1BE43290806
Participant Details

Original Note:

Haaretz denies all of the claims made in this post. https://x.com/haaretzcom/status/1718312889986212189?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718315035133456685
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D6E0C0CCD268E4A3991A95345A0F16C2FF3193DBF49C55E55911E1BE43290806
  • createdAtMillis - 1698567092840
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1718315035133456685D6E0C0CCD268E4A3991A95345A0F16C2FF3193DBF49C55E55911E1BE43290806