Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-28 20:51:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39DC74576E8AE7AEF2319F279A9101E979EB0AC398AEC8E3B03887D62A2EB470
Participant Details

Original Note:

For those disputing the $2.2m, read the ABA. it clearly states the breach amount (it has to to comply with #F1 regs). It is 1.6%, £1.864m or $2.2m The lower figure is a false narrative based on a fictitious & unaudited tax credit that RBR haven't claimed from the UK government

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718260426738155783
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39DC74576E8AE7AEF2319F279A9101E979EB0AC398AEC8E3B03887D62A2EB470
  • createdAtMillis - 1698526292967
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171826042673815578339DC74576E8AE7AEF2319F279A9101E979EB0AC398AEC8E3B03887D62A2EB470