Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-27 20:39:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB907B243517E67180FA1EB1039B1F7199F35C0804165BE783D31CB6F9354D8D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Gina refers Miller 2 It was a landmark case in the UK constitution Until it happened, no one knew, (including the Lord Chief Justice) that the prorogation was unlawful No one lied to the Queen R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister ... https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2019-0192-judgment.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718004237399998483
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AB907B243517E67180FA1EB1039B1F7199F35C0804165BE783D31CB6F9354D8D
  • createdAtMillis - 1698439173954
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1718004237399998483AB907B243517E67180FA1EB1039B1F7199F35C0804165BE783D31CB6F9354D8D