Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-28 08:48:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A6B4E205C8D5880FFD6851FDA23E2216FFA77B43F8D64EA7D5A1647A045B7B56
Participant Details

Original Note:

Como indica dentro de la noticia, el despido ha sido declarado improcedente porque la empresa no avisó de que había una cámara en la sala del obrador, que también se usaba de vestuario. Por tanto, la prueba no es válida. https://confilegal.com/20231023-panaderia-pierde-caso-de-despido-contra-una-empleada-que-orinaba-en-botes-de-comida-y-que-habia-sido-videograbada/?amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717978368501571666
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A6B4E205C8D5880FFD6851FDA23E2216FFA77B43F8D64EA7D5A1647A045B7B56
  • createdAtMillis - 1698482931356
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717978368501571666A6B4E205C8D5880FFD6851FDA23E2216FFA77B43F8D64EA7D5A1647A045B7B56