Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-27 23:01:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 893AB1D77F6214A3514DFC696538CFD03F8D05209B87F37895C29303C3F821DF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Como indica dentro de la noticia, el despido ha sido declarado improcedente porque la empresa no avisó de que había una cámara en la sala del obrador, que también se usaba de vestuario. Por tanto, la prueba no es válida. https://confilegal.com/20231023-panaderia-pierde-caso-de-despido-contra-una-empleada-que-orinaba-en-botes-de-comida-y-que-habia-sido-videograbada/?amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717978368501571666
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 893AB1D77F6214A3514DFC696538CFD03F8D05209B87F37895C29303C3F821DF
  • createdAtMillis - 1698447712374
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717978368501571666893AB1D77F6214A3514DFC696538CFD03F8D05209B87F37895C29303C3F821DF