Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-28 08:06:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4D5C86FAD9204950CCDBDBE1869BF3CB008B29F306E54E1BB8974E0264267A35
Participant Details

Original Note:

Como indica dentro de la noticia, el despido ha sido declarado improcedente porque la empresa no avisó de que había una cámara en la sala del obrador, que también se usaba de vestuario. Por tanto, la prueba no es válida. https://confilegal.com/20231023-panaderia-pierde-caso-de-despido-contra-una-empleada-que-orinaba-en-botes-de-comida-y-que-habia-sido-videograbada/?amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717978368501571666
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4D5C86FAD9204950CCDBDBE1869BF3CB008B29F306E54E1BB8974E0264267A35
  • createdAtMillis - 1698480380965
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17179783685015716664D5C86FAD9204950CCDBDBE1869BF3CB008B29F306E54E1BB8974E0264267A35