Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-27 19:01:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F837E8C904A1DE689639458E085C45032F4E75D4D962CA3C3EAFBC90669CC0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Como indica dentro de la noticia, el despido ha sido declarado improcedente porque la empresa no avisó de que había una cámara en la sala del obrador, que también se usaba de vestuario. Por tanto, la prueba no es válida. https://confilegal.com/20231023-panaderia-pierde-caso-de-despido-contra-una-empleada-que-orinaba-en-botes-de-comida-y-que-habia-sido-videograbada/?amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717978368501571666
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F837E8C904A1DE689639458E085C45032F4E75D4D962CA3C3EAFBC90669CC0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1698433314317
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17179783685015716660F837E8C904A1DE689639458E085C45032F4E75D4D962CA3C3EAFBC90669CC0E