Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-27 14:57:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DADF1F6AFB916AB8E62973039D092D2FB7E4CFA62BDD6DE9029715BD787032BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wasserstoff zum Heizen ist weder eine effiziente noch eine kostengünstige Alternative. https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/wasserstoff-energie-heizung-waermepumpe-zukunft-100.html »Wärmepumpen sind fünf Mal effizienter« »Wasserstoff ist fürs erste knapp und teuer« »Zu schade zum Verheizen« https://www.br.de/nachrichten/bayern/heizen-mit-wasserstoff-ist-das-sinnvoll,Tc5WRj8

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717892515146142191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DADF1F6AFB916AB8E62973039D092D2FB7E4CFA62BDD6DE9029715BD787032BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1698418645121
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717892515146142191DADF1F6AFB916AB8E62973039D092D2FB7E4CFA62BDD6DE9029715BD787032BC