Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-15 22:20:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D00147502D55491F083EC07DB76E8272020BFA3D9D7592D4BC8787E9C76CC07C
Participant Details

Original Note:

改憲は憲法96条に記された正式な手続きであり、「許されない」という言葉に法的根拠はありません。 また、国民投票による過半数の賛成も必要であるため、改憲がなされたら、それは権力者ではなく国民の総意であるといえます。 https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=321CONSTITUTION

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717858972580110543
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D00147502D55491F083EC07DB76E8272020BFA3D9D7592D4BC8787E9C76CC07C
  • createdAtMillis - 1715811634108
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1717858972580110543D00147502D55491F083EC07DB76E8272020BFA3D9D7592D4BC8787E9C76CC07C