Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-27 06:01:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: DBFDC09181A2D6EE44E9DE26C705CFCD377BB8C059E988654752C841B2E28C4B
Participant Details
Original Note:
The NYSRPA vs. Bruen case underscores only ‘dangerous and unusual’ weapons can be regulated. With ’Assault weapons’ like AR-15 in common use, a ban may conflict with this precedent, the Second Amendment, and 18 U.S.C. § 242, alongside numerous state constitutions. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4568294#:~:text=In%20Heller%2C%20the%20Supreme%20Court,test%20put%20forth%20in%20Bruen https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/20-843 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/242 https://gun-control.procon.org/state-constitutional-right-to-bear-arms/
All Note Details