Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-27 14:05:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E07545382E02DA4815F11EB375B751D42B5CB1B1513BE0938EA56F696787F7E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NYSRPA vs. Bruen case underscores only ‘dangerous and unusual’ weapons can be regulated. With ’Assault weapons’ like AR-15 in common use, a ban may conflict with this precedent, the Second Amendment, and 18 U.S.C. § 242, alongside numerous state constitutions. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4568294#:~:text=In%20Heller%2C%20the%20Supreme%20Court,test%20put%20forth%20in%20Bruen https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/20-843 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/242 https://gun-control.procon.org/state-constitutional-right-to-bear-arms/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717765568223174972
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E07545382E02DA4815F11EB375B751D42B5CB1B1513BE0938EA56F696787F7E
  • createdAtMillis - 1698415530404
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17177655682231749728E07545382E02DA4815F11EB375B751D42B5CB1B1513BE0938EA56F696787F7E