Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-27 19:01:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 40E8D3D9B6796F21F11D7F0ABA42217CE3B48733CAB26E4BE9FD871CC7A05579
Participant Details

Original Note:

Eugene Stoner would have been aware of SCOTUS 1939 case U.S. v. Miller- they ruled “military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.”- 2A covers weapons of war for civilians. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/307/174/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717741077925339321
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 40E8D3D9B6796F21F11D7F0ABA42217CE3B48733CAB26E4BE9FD871CC7A05579
  • createdAtMillis - 1698433281766
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171774107792533932140E8D3D9B6796F21F11D7F0ABA42217CE3B48733CAB26E4BE9FD871CC7A05579