Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-27 00:05:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 798C3267EF0A33F6F2EFCB354DA4407E6B72F8A3804F08C1734259CE6D35F2F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Yes, she very likely bought the shoes before the call for a boycott, possibly even years before, but that doesn't change the fact that the optics look pretty bad. Also, the proposed note is a nitpick, not a factual challenge. Take it to the replies, please.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717584579467292814
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 798C3267EF0A33F6F2EFCB354DA4407E6B72F8A3804F08C1734259CE6D35F2F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1698365115021
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717584579467292814798C3267EF0A33F6F2EFCB354DA4407E6B72F8A3804F08C1734259CE6D35F2F4