Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-26 23:48:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F09610083D13ADB73818201D6928CD43666EB5D20502BAE784F56C1376BD4107
Participant Details

Original Note:

性同一性障害特例法の5要件のうち、法第三条4項(生殖腺がない・生殖機能を永続的に欠く状態)は本裁判で憲法十三条違反と結論付けられましたが、同5項(変更後の性別の性器に近い外観を備える)については大法廷は判断を示さず、高裁に差し戻されました。 申立人の性別は現段階で変更されていません https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=415AC0100000111 https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUE17D8I0X11C23A0000000/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717432040524812570
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F09610083D13ADB73818201D6928CD43666EB5D20502BAE784F56C1376BD4107
  • createdAtMillis - 1698364098063
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717432040524812570F09610083D13ADB73818201D6928CD43666EB5D20502BAE784F56C1376BD4107