Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-26 01:31:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D1AEA9AEC37445A029151392993ADA12230210C225EA40F755C8721069BCA57
Participant Details

Original Note:

性同一性障害特例法の5要件のうち、法第三条4項(生殖腺がない・生殖機能を永続的に欠く状態)は本裁判で憲法十三条違反と結論付けられましたが、同5項(変更後の性別の性器に近い外観を備える)については大法廷は判断を示さず、高裁に差し戻されました 申立人の性別は現段階で変更されていません https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=415AC0100000111 https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUE17D8I0X11C23A0000000/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717305189710102653
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D1AEA9AEC37445A029151392993ADA12230210C225EA40F755C8721069BCA57
  • createdAtMillis - 1698283894328
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17173051897101026533D1AEA9AEC37445A029151392993ADA12230210C225EA40F755C8721069BCA57